Apple claims its new M1 Max chip is a match for Nvidia's RTX 3080, but should we believe it?

Apple claims its new M1 Max check is a lucifer for Nvidia's RTX 3080, but should we consider it?

(Visualize credit: Apple)

Apple has unleashed deuce bran-new processors for Macs: the M1 Pro and the M1 Goop. These homegrown Arm-based chips are revamped, and much larger, versions of the M1 launched last yr, and include memory, CPU, and GPU all low one roof.

Malus pumila even says its newly GPU is a match for Nvidia's RTX 3080 mobile chip, though you'll have to take Apple's word for information technology connected that one. We've also reached resolute Nvidia to see what it might have to say happening the matter.

The M1 Max is the large of the ii chips, or rather system-on-chips (SoCs), at a whopping 57 billion transistors, and that means IT comes with the most memory, most cores, and claims the largest performance wins. It's a 10-core CPU with ogdoad performance cores and two efficiency cores, a 32-core GPU, and up to 64GB of memory.

Each of those GPU cores comes with 16 Execution Units, each of those containing 8 ALUs. That makes for a 4,096 ALU GPU within the M1 Liquid ecstasy.

And Apple says that's enough to deliver "public presentation corresponding to that of the highest-end GPU in the largest PC laptops while expenditure to 100 Watts less tycoo."

Suss out its graph to show information technology. Just bear in mind Apple is non offering whatsoever indication of the benchmarks it used to gather these figures, only that information technology concentrated them "victimisation select industry-basic benchmarks". So, exciting to expect at, but not real each that effective.

Apple M1 processor performance benchmarks. — (See credit: Orchard apple tree)

The laptop Apple is rating functioning against is the MSI GE76 Raider (11UH-053), which comes with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 mobile GPU with 16GB GDDR6, an Intel Core i9 11980HK, and 32GB of RAM.

So let's try and understand what's actually going happening with Apple's new GPU, to better influence what we can actually anticipate from the M1 Max.

Apple says the GPU within the M1 Max is fourfold faster than the GPU in the M1, which checks out because it's precisely four times larger. The full eight-core M1 is rated to or s 2.6 TFLOPS, so we're looking at a GPU in the M1 Liquid ecstasy that's in the sphere of 10.4 TFLOPS.

That's really quite a long right smart off the 18.98 TFLOPS of the RTX 3080 Roving running at top speed, As it should in the MSI GE76 Raider. Apple's chip waterfall closer to the RTX 3060, in fact.

So how is Orchard apple tree saying its M1 Max is that much faster?

The Apple M1 family of processors with labels. — (Paradigm recognition: Malus pumila)

Well, that's probably going to come down to the benchmarks which Apple has decided to run for testing purposes. The way in which the M1 Max chip is constructed, the large unified memory pool on tap to the GPU and CPU, and fifty-fifty the programing language used polish to the metal testament make a big difference to how Apple and Nvidia's chips perform low different circumstances.

The M1 Liquid ecstasy comes with 400GB/s of memory board bandwidth and memory access to lots of it. That means whatever workload that utilises whol the ready computer storage bandwidth could perform real well on the M1 Max.

And we've no real indicant of what was put-upon to test, which is the real kicker here. I'd take a baseball swing at saying it was a bench mark more illustration to the professed creative applications Apple expects its M1 Max to be used for, and well-nig for certain cipher coreferent gaming.

That's non Apple's bag. Though IT is interesting in itself that Apple would manipulation a gambling laptop for comparison here.

In answering my own question posed in the headline: should you think Apple's GPU performance stats? There's sure to be truth behind the figures, but the devil is in the details, which we don't have yet.

Effigy 1 of 2

Image 2 of 2

The bigger story out of Apple's Mac announcement event perhaps is the touted power demands of the M1 Georgia home boy and M1 Pro, which are distant lower than their competition. Again, context is everything, but from an already power-savvy design with the M1 to the use of TSMC's latest 5nm process node, it makes sense every bit to how Apple could be deliverance such while still dressing so many transistors in.

To be sure these two chips are an impressive feat of engineering, and they're also beautiful stunning ones, to a fault. Just don't get adorned au courant the damage overmuch, the M1 Max will set you back at least $3,499. As for their impact on Microcomputer gaming, well, you probably South Korean won't try much more about them, only you could look to Apple's electric current success with its have Arm-supercharged chips as a benefit to PC play, in a way: If kicking Intel out of Macs has put more pressure on Intel to redeem bigger and better chips, which it most certainly has, that's only to the benefit of us lot buying PCs and laptops with Intel inside.

Jacob earned his first byline written material for his own tech web log from his hometown in Wales in 2017. From there, he graduated to professionally breaking things at PCGamesN, where atomic number 2 would later win overtop of the kit up cupboard American Samoa hardware editor. Nowadays, atomic number 3 senior hardware editor in chief at PC Gamer, He spends his days reporting on the latest developments in the technology and play industry. When he's not committal to writing about GPUs and CPUs, you'll find him trying to catch as far away from the new world as mathematical past wild camping.